I just found this clip on youtube and I'm utterly disgusted:
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9844.html and the jist of it is that the Washington Supreme Court voted against allowing same-sex marriage because according to them, marriage is for procreational purposes and defending traditional marriage ensures families will be made. Now a new law is coming up for debate that says married couples MUST have a child within 3 years of marriage or their marriages will be annulled.
I'm surprised that there isn't outrage against this bill. And I think I may have figured out why...
Try listing as many reasons, for a straight couple, to be against this bill:
"When and if me and my spouse decide to have children is none of the government's business!"
"The government has no right to interfere with the way my spouse and I wish to run our lives!"
"We want to be married, we don't want to have children"
Interesting how these reasons can be said by man or women, gay or straight couple, no? If straight conservative couples deplore this bill, they are inadvertently supporting the exact same rights of same-sex couples. Now I am scared. It'll be interesting to see how this all ends - will straight people allow a bill to pass that will control their lives just so they don't have to open their minds a tinsy weensy bit and understand the troubles faced by gay couples? Or will people smarten up and see that when the government comes into your bedroom, it ain't looking for a threesome?
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9844.html and the jist of it is that the Washington Supreme Court voted against allowing same-sex marriage because according to them, marriage is for procreational purposes and defending traditional marriage ensures families will be made. Now a new law is coming up for debate that says married couples MUST have a child within 3 years of marriage or their marriages will be annulled.
I'm surprised that there isn't outrage against this bill. And I think I may have figured out why...
Try listing as many reasons, for a straight couple, to be against this bill:
"When and if me and my spouse decide to have children is none of the government's business!"
"The government has no right to interfere with the way my spouse and I wish to run our lives!"
"We want to be married, we don't want to have children"
Interesting how these reasons can be said by man or women, gay or straight couple, no? If straight conservative couples deplore this bill, they are inadvertently supporting the exact same rights of same-sex couples. Now I am scared. It'll be interesting to see how this all ends - will straight people allow a bill to pass that will control their lives just so they don't have to open their minds a tinsy weensy bit and understand the troubles faced by gay couples? Or will people smarten up and see that when the government comes into your bedroom, it ain't looking for a threesome?
3 comments:
Lets just do some math here. My parents were married in July of '75, my sister was born in April of '79, so she was conceived in around July of '78, but she was a month premature, so that means my parents were over the three year limit. Uh Oh! My parents are no longer married!
My sister got married in August 2004, and is not yet pregnant, Uh Oh, Mandi and Josh better get on that baby making, or they can't be married anymore.
So I was at the gym tonight, doing my cardio and on the TV is CNN. They are discussing Ann Coulters slip up or something like that. One person was actually defending her and saying how it is so bad that this is overshadowing how pumped up and excited she made the crowd?!?!?
Hooray for fear and hate mongering!
Ann Coulter is funny/sad, she was on W5 and she said Canada was in Vietnam…. and the reported told her no…. Youtube it. I think Coulter is just a by-product of conservatism/ Fox News/ George Bush Jr ( I like to call him G-J). and the States in general. The real tragedy here is that she writes books and people actually buy them! I must say to cleanse yourselves of the Ann Coulter I suggest Youtubbin’ Amy Goodman. Goodman, is on the opposite side of the coin, hosts a popular radio show, Democracy Now. I’d love to see them square off in a debate on Neutral territory, not PBS and definitely not Fox News!
Post a Comment